I usually stay away from offtopics, but could not resist, maybe you should check this and "enlighten" us :P
Would you consider this as porno too?
http://www.unaaldia.net/wp-content/miguelangel001.jpg
Cause this guy has no "g" in front of that part that you consider to be soooo bad. So, if you find the previous image so nasty, this one should be a lot worse.
Maybe i am too inocent -i dont think so lol-, but I cant see the sexual intention in any of the pictures. Anyway, you will have to accept, sooner or later, that human beings are sexuated live beings, unlike amoebas.
Regards.
this is EXTREMELY INAPPROPIATE My 8 year old son just found this image from the KDE desktop as its linked to here and wanted to change his desktop! This is not a matter of porn vs nudity, its a matter of you thinking you have the right to expose my children to such things. By doing so you've inadverntly broken the law!
you can't hide it anyway how the people do look like without clothes. in 2 years your son will be on the funky way to maturity, its gonna be high time to learn the truth. better in a relaxed way than in a repressive environment. just explain to him what the picture tells. it that takes a man to be a dad.
I agree with you troy...This site is linked and is essentially part of KDE (or at least part of the experience). I dont have a prob with nude pics on the internet...it is just that some places are not appropriate and I think that this is one of them...or at least a separate category not thumbnailed on the main page.
There is NOTHING WRONG on nude photos! Human body is beautiful, nudity is natural. You are prudish moron if you don't accept this and your so will suffer.
I am so happy that I live in Europe, there aren't so prudish people.
Actually, what you mean to say is that you are totally incompetent as a parent. You have not been monitoring your child. In addition, it would appear that you are not remotely competent to speaking to your child about people who are not wearing clothes, why this woman is relaxing in this way, etc. Instead, you have been brainwashed(and apparently want to brainwash your child) into jumping to: nude woman equals 'porn'. It is not. I find the human body to be quite beautiful, not pornographic. Porn is the sex act. This image is not. Get a grip.
ack, we don't have a problem with nudity in europe. not even a special classification or wording is necessary. you would get fired for surfing at the workplace in general, but surely not due to viewing such a picture.
Actually, it is nudity for the sake of titillation. As such it is not porn, but it is still erotica, and still somewhat prurient. And you can still get fired from from many companies for viewing this.
I've got no problem with wallpapers like this on kde-look, but there really needs to be an "adult" filter to list it, as there was with the old themes.org. This doesn't block access, but keeps it from showing up while casually browsing.
ack! in every open air bath or at all uncommercialised lakes you can see the women with *less* clothes. they might visible to *all* other people and ages and might be even only a few meters away from your own towel ! it's only nature, nothing more, and nobody should feel offended.
I still do think that p0rn should be kept out of that site.
oh come on you're a big boy, right?
Because, if you aren't your really shouldn't be watching this :)
PLease don't feel affended, but this really isn't a big deal.
Ratings & Comments
18 Comments
I usually stay away from offtopics, but could not resist, maybe you should check this and "enlighten" us :P Would you consider this as porno too? http://www.unaaldia.net/wp-content/miguelangel001.jpg Cause this guy has no "g" in front of that part that you consider to be soooo bad. So, if you find the previous image so nasty, this one should be a lot worse. Maybe i am too inocent -i dont think so lol-, but I cant see the sexual intention in any of the pictures. Anyway, you will have to accept, sooner or later, that human beings are sexuated live beings, unlike amoebas. Regards.
this is EXTREMELY INAPPROPIATE My 8 year old son just found this image from the KDE desktop as its linked to here and wanted to change his desktop! This is not a matter of porn vs nudity, its a matter of you thinking you have the right to expose my children to such things. By doing so you've inadverntly broken the law!
you can't hide it anyway how the people do look like without clothes. in 2 years your son will be on the funky way to maturity, its gonna be high time to learn the truth. better in a relaxed way than in a repressive environment. just explain to him what the picture tells. it that takes a man to be a dad.
I agree with you troy...This site is linked and is essentially part of KDE (or at least part of the experience). I dont have a prob with nude pics on the internet...it is just that some places are not appropriate and I think that this is one of them...or at least a separate category not thumbnailed on the main page.
Supervise him.
Your son is going to suffer infinitely more damage from you raising him in such a repressed fashion.
There is NOTHING WRONG on nude photos! Human body is beautiful, nudity is natural. You are prudish moron if you don't accept this and your so will suffer. I am so happy that I live in Europe, there aren't so prudish people.
Correction: "your son will suffer"
Actually, what you mean to say is that you are totally incompetent as a parent. You have not been monitoring your child. In addition, it would appear that you are not remotely competent to speaking to your child about people who are not wearing clothes, why this woman is relaxing in this way, etc. Instead, you have been brainwashed(and apparently want to brainwash your child) into jumping to: nude woman equals 'porn'. It is not. I find the human body to be quite beautiful, not pornographic. Porn is the sex act. This image is not. Get a grip.
This isnt porn, but it is called nudity. There is nothing wrong with Nudity!
Technically, it's the display of nudity for the purpose of titillation. It's the titillation aspect that people are concerned with.
ack, we don't have a problem with nudity in europe. not even a special classification or wording is necessary. you would get fired for surfing at the workplace in general, but surely not due to viewing such a picture.
agreed
KDE-Look is not a porn gallery...
this ain't porn. Nudity isn't something that one should be offended by - at least, nobody is born dressed IMHO.
Actually, it is nudity for the sake of titillation. As such it is not porn, but it is still erotica, and still somewhat prurient. And you can still get fired from from many companies for viewing this. I've got no problem with wallpapers like this on kde-look, but there really needs to be an "adult" filter to list it, as there was with the old themes.org. This doesn't block access, but keeps it from showing up while casually browsing.
ack! in every open air bath or at all uncommercialised lakes you can see the women with *less* clothes. they might visible to *all* other people and ages and might be even only a few meters away from your own towel ! it's only nature, nothing more, and nobody should feel offended. I still do think that p0rn should be kept out of that site.
oh come on you're a big boy, right? Because, if you aren't your really shouldn't be watching this :) PLease don't feel affended, but this really isn't a big deal.