Hi Frenzy,
if you look in the history from tasmaniandiablo, she use different license, but all have some problems with law rights (GPL i.e is more for Software and in the EU not good chance for documents and pictures). So for a more professional worker whit a signing in the picture, CC by-nc-nd is for me OK and make sense. But you're right a CC by-nc-sa is better for the libre culture.
PS: But generally, I prevere a really own work with a clear license, what I can use on my desctop and on desktops from computers what are set up from me. (In best case the EXIF or better in the IPTC extension of a picture, that I have the license information also without any history and knowledge from the source of the picture).
Ratings & Comments
5 Comments
Very nice picture :-))) with a good composition! I see you have a good and stable license handling in the last pictures (CC BY-NC-ND) - very good ;-)
Thank you. Yes, and for the license thanks too. ;)))))))
I disagree about the license because nc and nd undermine libre culture.
It pleased me most of all.
Hi Frenzy, if you look in the history from tasmaniandiablo, she use different license, but all have some problems with law rights (GPL i.e is more for Software and in the EU not good chance for documents and pictures). So for a more professional worker whit a signing in the picture, CC by-nc-nd is for me OK and make sense. But you're right a CC by-nc-sa is better for the libre culture. PS: But generally, I prevere a really own work with a clear license, what I can use on my desctop and on desktops from computers what are set up from me. (In best case the EXIF or better in the IPTC extension of a picture, that I have the license information also without any history and knowledge from the source of the picture).